WebIn re Araynah B. Document Cited authorities 60 Cited in 10 Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Court: New York Family Court: Writing for the Court: EMILY M. OLSHANSKY: ... In the Matter of Araynah B. (DOB 8/9/2000), Amir R. (DOB 9/21/2006), Children under Eighteen Years of Age Alleged/Found to be Neglected by Moshammet R., Respondent. Web16 nov. 2010 · Clear and convincing evidence established that the agency satisfied its statutory obligation to make diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental …
MATTER OF BOSTON G. 157 A.D.3d 675 (2024) - Leagle
Web16 nov. 2010 · Full title:In the Matter of GANESHA B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. NYESHA H.… Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department Date published: Nov 16, 2010 CitationsCopy Citations 78 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010) 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8364 911 N.Y.S.2d 306 Citing Cases In re Tamara D. Web10 jan. 2024 · MATTER OF BOSTON G. 2024-00069, Docket No. N-17781-15. In the Matter of BOSTON G. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Appellant; JENNIFER G., Respondent. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. Decided January 10, 2024. Ordered that the order dated December 7, … hillary clinton fundraiser tickets
Matter of Maria S. (Samantha S.) - Justia Law
WebIn four related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother and father separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of (1) a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated August 10, 2009, as, after a hearing, found that they each … Web7 nov. 2014 · In the Matter of a Proceeding Under Article 10 of the Family Court Act, Maria S. Amanda S., Children Under Eighteen Years of Age Alleged to be Abused by … Web8 aug. 2024 · For the reasons we explained in Matter of Leenasia C. (Lamarriea C. — Maxie B.) (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 06050 [2024] [decided simultaneously herewith]), we reject petitioner agency's argument that, pursuant to Family Court Act § 1061, the Family Court was not authorized to modify the dispositional order to the extent of granting a … smart car seats 4